Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

September 22 2017

schwarzrotes
00:38
1492 ae68 500
Reposted fromtgs tgs viasofias sofias

September 11 2017

15:34
5944 de78
Reposted fromsadnessdove sadnessdove viasofias sofias

August 29 2017

schwarzrotes
11:17
0933 92eb 500
Reposted fromJamalus Jamalus viasofias sofias
09:17
2605 975d

yourstoryisnoteverover:

misandry-mermaid:

stfueverything:

always reblog

Relevant

She just looks so stressed and I can imagine why.

Reposted fromMerelyGifted MerelyGifted viasofias sofias

August 25 2017

schwarzrotes
11:59
4065 4ffb 500
Reposted fromsargon sargon viasofias sofias

August 24 2017

schwarzrotes
16:46
3748 9d76 500
Reposted fromtgs tgs viayetzt yetzt

August 23 2017

schwarzrotes
10:22
2498 7b93 500
Reposted fromtgs tgs viasofias sofias

August 22 2017

schwarzrotes
22:56
Reposted fromFlau Flau viasofias sofias

August 15 2017

schwarzrotes
10:40
Reposted fromgruetze gruetze viasofias sofias

August 07 2017

23:16
3620 afb0 500

profeminist:

Source

Want more info? Here ya go: 

image

This Biology Teacher Disproved Transphobia With Science 

ALSO:

Sex redefined

“The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that.”

More on anti-trans arguments as bad science

Reposted fromMinakat Minakat viayetzt yetzt

August 03 2017

schwarzrotes
11:37
8953 5938 500
Reposted fromInsomniaNervosa InsomniaNervosa viasofias sofias

August 01 2017

schwarzrotes
11:15
8484 7135 500
Reposted fromfungi fungi

July 29 2017

schwarzrotes
13:02
4504 11f2
Shh, Oscilloscope is sleeping.
Reposted fromTenSigis TenSigis viasofias sofias

July 05 2017

schwarzrotes
09:55
7898 83fd 500
Reposted frommiststueck miststueck viasofias sofias

July 03 2017

schwarzrotes
12:33
8153 ffd0
Reposted fromgreensky greensky viasofias sofias

July 01 2017

schwarzrotes
15:15
Bitte sehr. Sonst noch fragen? #Ehefüralle
Reposted fromdingens dingens viasofias sofias

June 19 2017

schwarzrotes
11:46

June 12 2017

10:58
1702 3834

aglassroseneverfades:

pmastamonkmonk:

schnerp:

feminism-is-radical:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

houroftheanarchistwolf:

aawb:

starsapphire:

is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what

That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING

What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?

It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot. 

image

It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. 

I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?

And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. 

Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.

We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine. 

What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do.

This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks: 

imageimageimage

Also: 

image

He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.

You can see her butthole for chrissakes

I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.

Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.

Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.

Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.

Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.

This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.

Reposted fromhelpfulDeathgod helpfulDeathgod

June 07 2017

schwarzrotes
09:01
08:53
5513 6a46 500
Reposted fromdominik dominik viasofias sofias
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl